Greens vote against decision to move fire service 999 control room out of Sussex
Greens have called for greater public scrutiny over fire service decisions after critical changes to the management of 999 fire emergencies were made in a meeting held behind closed doors.
Members of the public, press and fire service staff units were excluded from an East Sussex Fire Authority (ESFA) meeting, held to decide upon the future of the control room that handles 999 calls for the East Sussex fire service – including Brighton and Hove.
Greens voted against the decision to move the control room, raising serious concerns over the suitability of Surrey Fire Service to manage calls relating to East Sussex and Brighton and Hove, the impact on jobs and detrimental effect of losing local expertise when responding to emergencies.
Green Councillor and member of the East Sussex Fire Authority, Steph Powell, commented:
“In short, today’s decision is incredibly expensive and short-sighted. The fire service needs investment, and Greens believe that a local, standalone control centre would have been the best option for the future. And whilst detailed information was provided, the recommendation in the papers did not offer this, as at was cited as too costly. But today’s option was voted on simply because it was the cheapest on the table – when we need to put our fire service, its staff and our public safety first.”
Councillor Marianna Ebel, Green Councillor and member of the ESFA added:
“I remain concerned that such an important decision has been made behind closed doors as the detail and reports were kept confidential. The public has a right to know how public money is spent, especially such significant sums of money.
“I am also very concerned about the impact this decision has both on public safety and on the staff who work to respond to critical emergencies in the Sussex Control Room. Many employees could now face increased working hours and changing working conditions including longer journeys to work, which could negatively impact their wellbeing. Longer journeys for staff will also increase carbon impact, at a time when we should be looking to reduce it. Given the nature of the work we ask staff to undertake, we must do better to prioritise public safety.”