menu

Sab Samuel, known as drag queen Aida H Dee, suffers broken jaw after being attacked in Cardiff

Police are “examing CCTV” after Sab Samuel, also known as drag queen Aida H Dee, had their jaw broken after holding hands with their fiancée in Cardiff.

Sab, who was celebrating their engagement when they were attacked in the city during the early hours of Sunday, May 19 said: “It’s not fair – I just wanted to propose to my boyfriend – why do they always steal the best moments?

“We were celebrating our engagement – it should have been one of the best experiences that anyone should be able to have, where I proposed to my boyfriend and he is now my fiancée.

“We were walking down the road holding hands.

“Before I knew it, I was being punched in the face and I fell to the floor.”

During the attack, their engagement ring was lost.

“I just wanted to get it back,” said Mr Samuel, who works as a drag queen telling stories to children.

The suspects

“The police said my health and safety was their top priority, but as soon as I got to the hospital I left.

“I went back to near the McDonald’s and I was just crying and searching on the ground for it.”

The ring was eventually found ring and then Sab went back to hospital where scans showed they had a fractured jaw. Sab, who is recovering at home, said this has made them more determined to go out and hold hands with their partner.

A South Wales Police spokesperson confirmed they were investigating the assault and treating the assault as a hate crime.

“A 29-year-old man was assaulted by two other men close to McDonald’s at around 3.15am,” they said.

“One of the suspects made a homophobic remark during the incident which is being treated as a hate crime.

“Hate crime has no place in society and is a priority for South Wales Police.

“Officers are examining CCTV as part of the on-going investigation.”

If you were witness to this assault, or if you have any information, call 101.

Standing Against Hate: Brighton marks IDAHOBIT

Standing Against Hate: Brighton marks IDAHOBIT 2024 with Community Activism

On May 17, the vibrant Ledward Centre pulsed with the energy of unity and resistance as the community came together to celebrate the International Day Against Homophobia, Biphobia, and Transphobia (IDAHOBIT). This annual event, which raises awareness of LGBTQ+ rights and combats discrimination, saw community, activists and allies participate in an inclusive and impactful evening.

Rainbow Chorus

The Importance of IDAHOBIT

IDAHOBIT, observed globally, commemorates the World Health Organisation‘s decision in 1990 to declassify homosexuality as a mental disorder. This day has since evolved into a powerful symbol of resistance against LGBTQ+ discrimination and violence.

“This event is crucial,” said Shanni Collins, from Brighton & Hove City Council‘s LGBTQ Workers’ Forum and LGBTQ+ rights advocate. “It’s not just about celebrating progress but also about acknowledging the ongoing struggles faced by our community worldwide.”

Brighton, known for its inclusive spirit and robust LGBTQ+ community, marked IDAHOBIT with an event designed to educate and inspire. Led by Unite the Union – putting its money where its mouth is and advocating for real systemic change and community led organisations – the city showcased its commitment to equality and justice.

Sarah Savage

The event with the harmonic opulence of Brighton’s Rainbow Chorus, which shared a series of perfectly pitched songs celebrating community, chosen family and ending with the iconic This is Me. Meg, chair of the Rainbow Chorus, said: “Brighton has always been at the forefront of LGBTQ+ rights in the UK, our community’s strength lies in our diversity and our unwavering support for one another.”

Dr Emma Lewis, a psychologist specialising in LGBTQ+ issues, emphasised the importance of mental health support. “Events like these provide a safe space for individuals to share their experiences and find solidarity. It’s a reminder that we are not alone.”

Speakers included: Ziggy Hopkins, TNBI community peer, writer and activist; Damian McCarthy & Tomas Green from Unite South East; Michael Hydes from the Metropolitan Community Church, who spoke of the power of communities; Sarah Savage from Trans Pride Brighton & Hove, who spoke on the strength of the local and national community, the phenomenal growth and affirmation of Trans Pride and the essential support of allies; Dave Jones, who offered the wisdom of community memory drawing sharp parallels between the misinformation and targeting of queer people during Section 28 and the current culture wars against trans communities; and Sian Berry, parliamentary candidate for the Green Party, who answered some community questions.

Michael Hydes

Sophie Patel, who went along to watch, shared her experience: “Being alongside so many people who share a common goal was incredibly empowering. It reminded me that our collective voice is strong and that we can make a difference.”

A Global Perspective

While Brighton’s IDAHOBIT celebrations were a testament to local solidarity, they also connected with a global movement. Activists highlighted the importance of international cooperation in combating LGBTQ+ discrimination and violence.

“IDAHOBIT is a reminder that our fight is not isolated,” said Maria Rodriguez, an international human rights activist. “It’s part of a broader struggle for human rights and dignity. We must continue to support our brothers and sisters worldwide who face persecution and violence.”

As the evening came to a close, the message was clear: while progress has been made, the journey toward equality is far from over. Activists called for continued vigilance and action to address the persistent challenges faced by the LGBTQ+ community.

“Today is a day of both celebration and reflection,” said Damian McCarthy. “We honour how far we’ve come, but we also recommit to the work that still needs to be done. Every act of activism, no matter how small, contributes to the larger goal of equality.” Learn more about Unite the Union South East here

A Call to Action

Brighton’s IDAHOBIT 2024 was not just an event but a call to action. It reminded the community of their collective power and the importance of standing together against hate. As the rainbow flags were lowered and the crowds dispersed, the spirit of the day lingered, urging all to continue the fight for a more just and inclusive world.

“It is now more important than ever that we reject the divisive culture wars and dehumanising rhetoric that seeks to split our community and turn us,our allies and the working class across the world against each other. “said Tomas Green from Unite

“We are stronger together,” said Billie Lewis, manager of the Ledward Centre. “And together, we will continue to push for a world where everyone can live without fear of discrimination or violence. ”

 

OPINION: Amnesty International responds to government’s “dangerous” ban on teaching sex education to children under the age of nine

The UK government has announced that Relationships, Sex and Health Education curriculum will not be taught to children until the age of nine, a move which Amnesty International has called “dangerous”.

The government’s new guidance proposes that children should not be taught sex education under the age of nine and even after this it should only be from a “scientific standpoint” (i.e. teaching anatomy among other topics).

Sex and relationships education has only been compulsory since September 2020. Currently primary schools in the UK are obliged to teach relationship and health education, not sex education, although many do because they believe it is necessary to keep children safe.

According to statutory safeguarding guidance teachers have a duty to report sexual harassment and violence. However, by prohibiting the teaching of sex education before age nine, the Government risks depriving children of the knowledge they need to understand what is inappropriate and how they can report it.

Amnesty welcomes a section within the proposals dedicated to sexual harassment and sexual violence. This includes harassment that was previously not covered, such as stalking as well as advice for teachers on how to address misogynistic online influencers. However, given the prevalence of harmful misogynistic behaviour and how early children are exposed to it, this knowledge must be delivered at the correct time for children to be equipped to keep themselves and others safe.

The upcoming consultation on this guidance will be open for just nine weeks and comes in the middle of exam season – with the deadline just before the summer holidays. This puts teachers in the difficult position of not knowing what curriculum they will be teaching in September. Even with scarce financial and human resources, teachers have worked hard to develop excellent curriculums to teach RSHE with parents (who can see the materials shared in the classroom).

The Government’s move to introduce the teaching of protected characteristics (this includes a persons’ disability, race, sex and sexual orientation) later in secondary school means younger children will not learn about the importance of equality in British law.

Teachers have reported that boys as young as 12 are espousing misogynistic views having been exposed to Andrew Tate or similar influencers. There is a concrete risk that discriminatory beliefs might set in early and will be more difficult for teachers to tackle as children grow up.

Many schools already deliver excellent education about protected characteristics. It is not clear whether they will have to stop.

Responding to the Government’s announcement that new age limits will be introduced into the Relationships, Sex and Health Education (RSHE) curriculum, Sacha Deshmukh, Amnesty International UK’s Chief Executive, said: “The Government’s new proposals for sex education are dangerous and put the safety and wellbeing of children at risk.

“While the Government fixates on so-called ‘gender ideology’, schools are trying to deal with peer sexual abuse and children as young as seven being exposed to pornography. This should be a call to strengthen inclusive sex and relationships education, not needlessly limit it.

“A whole generation of LGBTI children and young people were left scarred by Section 28 – we should strive not to make the same mistakes again.

“Women, girls and LGBTI people continue to face discrimination, bullying, intimate violence and a lack of access to the support they desperately need. There is strong and wide-ranging evidence that sex education does prevent abuse and violence.

“Children of all ages have the right to a well-rounded education and should not fear discrimination. Schools need more resources, more training, and more support for teachers to deliver inclusive relationship, health and sex education which responds to the challenges children face today.

“We live in the 21st century – LGBTI young people, equal marriage and diverse families are the norm. To ignore this puts an entire generation’s mental and physical welfare in peril.”

Little progress for LGBTQ+ rights in the UK, new pan-European research shows

New research has shown that Europe is increasingly polarised over gay and transgender rights, as reports of hate crime and harassment reach record levels across the continent.

The annual ILGA-Europe Rainbow Map and Index, which ranks 49 countries on their rights protections, praised Germany, Iceland, Bulgaria and Slovenia for passing laws to tackle LGBTQ+ hate crime during the last year.

Despite widespread trans rhetoric in mainstream media and over social media, the United Kingdom rose one place to 16th, while points were awarded to Belgium, Cyprus, Iceland, Norway and Portugal for bans on so-called conversion therapy, a widely discredited practice that seeks to change a person’s sexuality or gender identity.

Conversely, countries such as Montenegro and Italy both fell down the ranking due to stalling policies on legislative protection. This follows Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni banning the listing of same-sex couples as parents on their children’s birth certificates last year. The practice had previously been done in some regions in the absence of any clear legislation.

Earlier this week, a survey from the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights showed reports of violence and harassment against LGBTQ+ people had risen to a record high, with 14% of 100,000 respondents across Europe saying they had been targeted between 2018 and 2023.

Intersex and transgender people were found to be especially vulnerable, facing more violence and harassment than other minorities. Intersex people are born with atypical chromosomes or sex characteristics, meaning they cannot be easily categorised as either male or female.

“There are not enough protections against violence in Europe, both at an institutional and individual level – this opens the door for backsliding,” Chaber, ILGA-Europe’s executive director, said.

ILGA-Europe also said governments in Spain, Slovenia, Finland and Sweden had not renewed action plans to ensure LGBTQ+ rights progress.

Germany made the most improvement on the map, moving from 14th to 10th place, while Iceland moved up three spots to second place. Malta has topped the list for the ninth year running.

At the other end of the spectrum are Turkey, Azerbaijan and Russia, the latter of which is now the lowest ranking country after introducing bans to trans healthcare and legal gender recognition last year. The country has also begun convicting LGBTQ+ activists as “extremists”, following a Supreme Court ruling last year.

The map showed many countries bidding to join the European Union, including Ukraine, Serbia and Albania, are falling behind in their commitments to protect LGBTQ+ people, while Georgia‘s “foreign agents” law, which activists say could target and marginalise LGBTQ+ groups, was likened to Russia’s anti-LGBTQ+ legislation by ILGA-Europe.

“The map is really showing us that Europe is becoming more and more polarised,” Chaber added. “LGBTQ+ people and their rights are used as scapegoats and being weaponised in discourse.”

To see all results, CLICK HERE

FEATURE: A 63-year struggle for intersex recognition and rights

Peter Tatchell Foundation has shared the heart-breaking personal story of an intersex woman, Yvonne Grey, to shine a light on the ill-treatment and struggles of intersex people. Peter Tatchell, the foundation’s director, said: “Family and medical abuse of intersex people is global. Stigmatisation and discrimination are rife. This is a personal tale of inspiring resilience in the face of cruel adversity.”

Yvonne Grey writes: It is 12 June 1961 – the name on my UK birth certificate is David Todd. But in the box denoting my sex there is simply a red horizontal line.

Fifteen years later, in 1976, I saw the document for the very first time as my brother taunted me: “There you are, you see, you’re a nothing. You’re not a boy or a girl – just a nothing.”

What my father had tried for so many years to conceal from me in the right-hand drawer of his writing bureau, is that I was born intersex – or what medics use to refer to as a “True Hermaphrodite”. That is, I had a reproductive and sexual anatomy that in biological terms doesn’t neatly fit either the box of female or male. Hence the red line, marked crudely in pen.

However, it wasn’t simply a matter of striking through the truth; my father also insisted, often aggressively, that I was male and that I call myself a boy.

I was born intersex, but I have wanted to be female my entire life – from the earliest age that I could express a recognition of myself. My family denied me my true self all my life, even now as I approach my 63rd birthday.

At the age of about nine, I had a junior school teacher who learned how I was being forced to be male and saw the physical pain and discomfort I was suffering.

This teacher was the only one I could confide in about my desire to be a girl. I knew I would be in big trouble with my parents if they found out about me telling her this.

One night the teacher appeared on a TV quiz show, and used the opportunity to very bravely mention the way I was being abused. When being introduced, she announced her name and then said: “I am here to let one of my pupils know that he isn’t a boy but a girl”.

My parents saw the programme and my father went berserk. He lifted me bodily over the settee and threw me into the passageway. The teacher went on to say more things about me but l could not hear a word, as my parents were screaming and shouting their heads off. They said they would deal with the teacher the next day and l was sent to my room. The door was locked, so l had to stay there and heard nothing more.

The following day l did briefly meet the teacher at school and l told her exactly what had happened at home. Soon after that she was escorted out the building. She lost her job for defending me. She was my hero. Her last words were: “At least my conscience is clear.” She was the only person to speak to me the way a decent person should. l never saw her again and nobody else ever supported me again for a very long time.

When I was 11, my father gave me some strict instructions: “Never say to anyone that rubbish that you want to be a girl”. My father got very angry with me when I replied that being a girl was what I wanted. He overpowered me and, unzipping my pants, groped my genitals and screamed in my face repeatedly: “What am l holding sir? What am l holding?”. I was very afraid. My mother just stood there and my brother laughed. My father would not release me until l said what he was holding.


Soon afterwards, I was told I needed a routine operation. I found myself in the local Tynemouth Victoria Jubilee Infirmary being interrogated tersely by a surgeon: “OK, you’ve had long enough to make your mind up about what sex you want to be. So, do you want to be a boy or a girl?” I was shocked by this confrontational manner and immediately shouted “GIRL!” and “FEMALE!”.

This resulted in an argument between the surgical team concerning how they should proceed. One of the team then turned to me and said that he must act as my father wanted and make me a boy.

Fearful of what would be done, l tried to escape from the bed, but the ward orderly held me down and l was put to sleep against my will.

While I was under gas, the doctors circumcised me, but they also did something to my upper lip, right under my nose, which left me in agony. No explanation was given, but that was the only part of my face where I ever grew facial hair.

Curiously, they made a permanent cut in the nail of the second smallest toe on my right foot. I was told that this would be a lasting mark to indicate how I was born different. The medical staff were very dismissive and would not answer my questions about this medical marking of my body without my permission.

In 1974, when I was 13, my father drugged me and tied my arms and legs to a chair. An unknown man came into the room with a briefcase and conducted a sort of backstreet laryngoplasty. He inserted a medical device to force open my mouth and then put a strange instrument down my throat. He did something to my throat, I don’t know what, with the aim of lowering my voice to make me sound more like a boy. I never consented to that either!

The following year, my whole school class year went to Switzerland skiing. My parents refused to let me go, citing the reason that nobody wanted me to go and no one liked me. But the real reason was probably because this was before they had my original birth certificate changed from a red line to say boy. This meant that with my sex blank, I could not get a passport and therefore not travel.

You must understand that my family treated me like an unloved mistake. All that I ever got to hear about my condition was very limited and either guarded or overheard by accident.

Later in 1975, aged 14, I felted so abused that I attempted suicide by hanging. I tied a rope to a punch bag hook and stepped off a bench to dangle by my neck. My father had been spying on me, as he often did, and kicked open the door, gasping with shock but also with a smile on his face.

He said that he would like to see me die there and then but that would “complicate” things. At that point, after leaving me to choke for a short while, he pushed the bench back under my feet but left the rope around my neck. l struggled to remove the rope but father slapped my hands away, so the rope stayed there. He then undid my pants and groped me.

Eventually, he bored of this, lifted me off the hook and threw me into the corner of the room. That was when he made the mistake of gloating and telling me that he had the surgeons sew me up as a baby. This procedure was because, he said, when l was born, urine didn’t come out where it should but came out “there”. He pointed and touched my scrotum.

“lt was me that did this to you,” he said vengefully. “I don’t want you to die today David. l want you to die every day for the rest of your life.” He then ordered me downstairs. l overheard him describing my suicide attempt to my mother. She told him: “So why didn’t you just let him hang?” You can imagine how worthless and loathed that made me feel.


l remember Mr Cundell, the form teacher, scolding me that same week in school. Referring to the rope marks around my neck, he accused me in front of the whole class of having a love bite from my “homosexual lover.” He then threatened me with ”Caesar” – his leather corporal punishment strap. It was open season on me by everyone in my life. I was totally isolated and victimised, with no one to protect and care for me.
At the start of my early twenties, there was a new attempt to erase my history: I was ordered by my family to go with my brother to the local Register Office in North Shields to obtain a fresh birth certificate with the word “male” written on it. I was frog marched there. My brother beat me up outside the building. I was threatened with being made homeless by my own family unless I agreed to the change. The original birth certificate – like my true identity – was, according to my father, “not for me to have.” The change was duly made and from then on I was officially a man – despite being intersex and wanting to live as a woman.

Undeterred by this birth certificate change, and by the family’s pressure, threats and demands, at 22 I said to my GP that I wanted surgery to make me fully female. He told me I had a uterus, but that far from it being my choice, it was actually my family’s right to decide whether I should be a boy or a girl. I was 22 and still expected to live according to my parent’s diktats.

Even at this age, I had to ask my father for permission to start the process of becoming female. In response, he beat me up and threw me through a glass door. My mother spat on me, called me mad and screamed that l would bring shame on the family name.

My father reluctantly told me l could have my original birth certificate with the red line, still shut away in the bureau drawer, but only if l promised to never again demand a “sex change.” I refused.

After being thrown out of the family home, my GP also cut me off; telling me I would never be allowed to see my medical notes again, and that I must just live as a man as my family had decided.

When I was sent to another doctor in Newcastle, she basically made fun of me and referred to me as a transvestite. She told me to go away and live as a man for the next ten years – if, after this time, I still wanted to be female, then I could come back and see her.


Later on, after much effort, I succeeded in changing my name on official documents, like my driving licence, from David Todd to Yvonne Grey. This legal change was executed on 23 March 1990, with solicitors in Wallsend. But I could still not change my birth certificate.

In early 1990 or 1991, I finally managed to be seen at Charing Cross Hospital gender identity clinic in London. But things were about to get worse. One day, the doctor in charge of my case, Dr X, sent an assistant into the waiting room to get me to sign what she called a “consent form”. She apologised for the treatment I had received so far, and the length of time it had taken for them to understand what I was. She indicated that as soon as I signed my name in the space on the front of the document, then I would get the treatment I truly deserved.

It all appeared to be an elaborate trick. When I tore off the false front cover of the document, I found the title: Survey on the Sexual Habits and Fantasies of Male Transvestites. Inside was a series of tick-box questions, including: “Do you prefer the imagery of young boys or young girls in school uniforms or normal clothes?” Medical staff suddenly appeared and seized the form from me, muttering words that sounded like: “Don’t worry, we’ll get him another way!”.

My life changed for the better, in 1994, aged 33, when I met Professor Richard Green, a colleague of Dr X. He showed me my medical notes in a buff cardboard folder with bold red letters across the front: “On no account should the contents of this folder be shown to this patient”.

At last, I got the truth. Professor Green explained that l was a very rare type of person called a “Congenital Eunuch” or “True Hermaphrodite” – a person born with ambiguous genitals. This is different from Mixed Gonadal Dysgenesis (MGD), a condition that affects how the body grows and develops before birth and at puberty. People with MGD have gonads (glands) that may not develop fully, and they may not make typical amounts of hormones, whereas I had an ovotestis, which contains both ovarian and testicular tissue.

Professor Green explained that my medical notes still had chromosome karyotype XXY (an anomaly) written on them but the truth was that I had XY (the male chromosome), despite having a female uterus and one oviteste (mix of a testicle and an ovary). He said that is why he classified me a “True Hermaphrodite”.

After Dr X found out that Professor Green had given me this information, I never saw my notes again.

I did finally get my operation, in 1997. But they cut out my womb, despite me saying that I wanted to be a woman. It was sealed in an airtight plastic bag with my name and hospital number and said something like: “Adult human uterus and oviteste”. lt was shoved in my face as l lay on the hospital bed, and then it was snatched away. My wishes counted for nothing – again! I wonder if it is now in a museum of medical curiosities?

It is 2024 – the name on my birth certificate is still David Todd and the copy at the General Register Office has the word “boy”. They are still trying to pass me off as a male when in truth I am intersex – a “True Hermaphrodite” – and when I had always wished to be a woman. Sixty-three years on, and I am still fighting for the recognition of who I truly am: Yvonne Grey, proud intersex woman!

For legal reasons, Peter Tatchell Foundation has concealed the identity of Dr X at Charing Cross hospital in the 1990s. The foundation has published Yvonne’s story in good faith and believe her to have “given a true account of her decades of neglect, abuse and erasure”.   

New show at Camden People’s Theatre to revive the vital yet overlooked history of the UK’s only dedicated lesbian centre

Camden People’s Theatre (CPT) in partnership with MIRRORBALL present GRILLS, a theatre production and interactive installation reviving the vital yet overlooked history of the ground-breaking work – and bringing to life the pioneering spirit  – of the UK’s only dedicated lesbian centre.

The Camden Lesbian Centre (CLC) began in 1982 when a group of white lesbians met via the Kentish Town Lesbian Group – a community which held regular socials at the Women’s Workshop. Meanwhile, the Black Lesbian Group (BLG) was established in 1984 to challenge the racism, sexism, and homophobia black gay women faced. In 1985, the grassroots groups merged to form CLCBLG on the agreement that the management committee comprise of at least 50% black lesbians and that the BLG remains an autonomous group.

Finding a permanent venue for the combined group proved difficult; with Margaret Thatcher abolishing the Greater London Council, core supporters were stripped of their power, ongoing funding issues plagued the group and they also contended with the Government’s Section 28 legislation – the ‘criminalisation of the promotion of homosexuality’. Finally in 1986, the CLCBLG was granted the licence for an old retail space – despite mass resistance, extreme hostility, and a public attack from members of the tenants’ association.

Protests included a petition highlighting ‘the moral danger’ to ‘young girls going to school in the near vicinity’. Even in the face of such adversity, the CLCBLG centre ran for years, welcoming lesbians of any ethnicity, age, or ability. Lesbians from all backgrounds formed a tight-knit community and came together to protest, party, learn about herstory, pick up craft skills, and go on cultural outings. In the early 1990s, funding became unsustainable and the space that served as a safe haven for so many, closed its doors.

With the records and the history of the group archived in Glasgow, the trailblazing effect that the organisation had on the local community has been all but forgotten. But, with GRILLS, (a term affectionately used for ‘girls” within the 1980s London lesbian community), archived materials, imagined relationships, real protests, and the palpable queer joy unearthed from found artefacts are brought together in a powerful performance. The production delves into the significant impact of the CLCBLG and poses urgent questions about cultural memory, representation, and progression within the LGBTQ+ communities.

Why have the stories of such a critical institution been moved over 400 miles away to Glasgow? What really happened at ‘Camden Dykes Get Your Claws Out’? Can we imagine a future where LGBTQ+ and BIPOC voices are truly seen & heard? How do we truly progress when we struggle to connect with our elders and can’t learn from our past? Do we always have to start again? What does progress mean if we can’t build on what’s come before? GRILLS confronts these issues head-on, considering the effects of such displacement on collective memory and cultural identity, and rekindling a connection with a past that continues to resonate deeply in the present struggles and triumphs of the queer community.

GRILLS confronts the parallels between the 1980s and 2024: the rise of fascism, the policing of LGBTQ+ rights and the closing of essential community spaces, and asks, what do we miss by being unable to gather freely, then and now? Interrogating the structures that govern public services and the silencing of marginalised groups, GRILLS is a show about intergenerational queerness.

Sixty per-cent of London’s queer spaces have closed in the past decade. And the LGBTQ+ clubs we have left are still primarily considered spaces for gay men. Sometimes people make the argument that queer spaces are reducing because we’re becoming more inclusive as a society, but that takes away from the fact that queer spaces give those who visit them a sense of belonging where they can be their complete real selves. Camden Borough’s free spaces – essential for marginalised groups as places to gather and share – have been decimated by fires, mandatory pricing and gates. When othered histories aren’t saved and we struggle to meet our predecessors, archiving becomes political.

GRILLS confronts the parallels between the 1980s and 2024: the rise of fascism, the policing of LGBTQ+ rights and the closing of essential community spaces.

CPT’s Artistic Director Brian Logan says: “At a time when queer spaces are under critical pressure for survival, what better story to tell than this one – which invites reflection on a different period in queer consciousness, and asks searching questions about history, solidarity and legacy.”

Company Co-Directors and writers Chloe Christian and Olivia Dowd met with members of the CLCBLG to hear their stories first-hand. Chloe says: “We interviewed a woman whose partner, who had passed away 15 years earlier, had been very involved with the BLG. We had a great conversation with her, learning about their experiences and lots of information about her partner, the group and their involvement in it.

“Then in the rehearsal room, I had photos out from the archive and one of the cast members asked about her, and we were able to describe this person’s whole life; everything they did at BLG, everything they did afterwards, her publications and her work in academia. It really felt like we had reached her and had an insight into her life – someone who had done something small but huge.

“We had been able to get a real insight into a giant on whose shoulders we now stand. They made a significant difference to what we now have and it was a pleasure to share that with the team.”

GRILLS is at Camden People’s Theatre, London from Tuesday 4 – Saturday, 22 June, 7pm with a matinee on Saturdays at 3pm. Tickets HERE

Candidates confirmed for Sussex Police & Crime Commissioner election and Queen’s Park and Kemptown by-elections

Elections for the Sussex Police and Crime Commissioner will be taking place on Thursday, 2 May.

The candidates standing for election have been confirmed:

  • Jamie BennettLiberal Democrats 
  • Katy BourneConservative Party 
  • Jonathan Christopher KentGreen Party 
  • Paul Adrian RichardsLabour and Co-operative Party

Find out more about the 2024 Sussex Police and Crime Commissioner election.

From 10 April, you can find more information on the candidates, including their aims and proposals, by visiting the Choose My PCC website.

Find out more about the roles and responsibilities of the Police and Crime Comissioner.

By-elections will also take place in Brighton & Hove to elect new ward councillors for Queen’s Park and Kemptown on 2 May.

The by-elections will fill the vacancies caused by the resignation of Chandni Mistry and Bharti Gajjar. The candidates for the by-elections have now been confirmed.

Queen’s Park:

  • Sunny ChoudhuryConservative Party 
  • Milla GaugeLabour Party
  • Dominique HallLiberal Democrats  
  • Adrian HartBrighton & Hove Independents 
  • Luke WalkerGreen Party

Kemptown:

  • Robert James BrownLiberal Democrats 
  • Gary FarmerBrighton & Hove Independents 
  • Jamie Gillespie – Independent candidate
  • Théresa Ann MackeyLabour Party 
  • Josephine Victoria O’CarrollConservative Party  
  • Ricky PerrinGreen Party

If you would like to vote in the Sussex Police & Crime Commissioner election and/or the Queen’s Park or Kemptown by-elections, you must be registered to vote by midnight on Tuesday, 16 April.

If you’re not already registered, or if you’ve recently moved to a new address, CLICK HERE

If you can’t get to a polling station on the day, you can also apply for a postal or proxy vote. You must apply for a postal vote by 5pm on 17 April at the latest.

You can also ask someone you trust to vote on your behalf – this is known as a proxy vote. You should apply for a proxy vote by 5pm on 24 April or change existing proxy arrangements by 5pm on 17 April.

Last year, the government brought in new legislation which requires voters to show photo identification when voting at polling stations. This means you must bring photo ID to vote in the Police & Crime Commissioner election. Find out more and see which forms of photo ID are accepted.

If you don’t have a valid form of photo ID, you can apply for a free Voter Authority Certificate (VAC) online. You’ll need to apply by 5pm on Wednesday, 24 April to get a Voter Authority Certificate for the 2 May elections.

For more information, visit the elections pages on Brighton & Hove City Council’s website.  

10 Years On: Humanists UK reflects on Same-Sex Marriage Act coming into force

The first same-sex marriages took place just after midnight on 29 March 2014, despite the Marriage (Same-Sex Couples) Act receiving Royal Assent on 17 July 2013.

The Act’s primary aim was to allow for marriages of same-sex couples across England and Wales, and Humanists UK was a leading voice in bringing about this pivotal change. It was a founding member of the Coalition for Equal Marriage, the key coalition of groups that worked to secure the Bill, and as a result of its efforts, Humanists UK was one of only two organisations – alongside Stonewall – thanked in the final debate on the Bill in the House of Lords.

Yet, according to Humanists UK, the anniversary is a “bittersweet moment” for humanist couples. The Marriage (Same-Sex Couples) Act also gave the UK Government the power to legally recognise humanist marriages by Order whenever it chooses — something it has since failed to do. Instead, humanist marriages have been subjected to review after review, meaning many humanist couples are still waiting to legally marry in a ceremony meaningful to them ten years on.

“Humanist marriages are reflective of the values of many in our society, and it is time that they receive the legal recognition they deserve.”

Andrew Copson, Humanists UK Chief Executive, commented: “The Marriage Act recognised the fundamental right of couples to love and marry irrespective of their gender. It signified major progress for same-sex couples and for UK society as a whole, and I am proud of Humanists UK’s involvement in achieving this.

“But as we reflect on the progress made over the past decade, we must also confront the challenges that remain unresolved. Humanist marriages are reflective of the values of many in our society, and it is time that they receive the legal recognition they deserve.”

In 2020, the High Court found the lack of legal recognition of humanist marriages discriminatory when six humanist couples brought a legal challenge. In her judgment, Mrs Justice Eady said that the Secretary of State ‘cannot simply… sit on his hands’ and do nothing to resolve the matter. However, given that the Government was giving the matter consideration in the form of a wholesale review into marriage law by the Law Commission – which it said was the desirable way forward – she said that the Government’s refusal to act immediately could be justified ‘at this time’. Since then, however, the review and its outcome have continued to be delayed, and the Government has carried out interim marriage reform in the meantime while continuously overlooking humanist marriages.

To commemorate the 10-year anniversary of the Act’s Royal Assent in July 2013, Humanists UK delivered hundreds of handwritten wedding invitations to the Justice Secretary ‘cordially inviting’ him ‘to afford couples freedom of choice and legally recognise humanist marriages in England and Wales’. The invites were filled in by Humanists UK members including many who want humanist marriages themselves, all highlighting the personal significance of such a move for the senders.

At the delivery, Humanists UK was joined by Peter McGraith and David Cabreza, the first same-sex couple in England and Wales to legally marry, just after midnight on 29 March 2014. Reflecting on the last ten years, Peter, who is a humanist, said: “Humanist ceremonies are for any couple – gay, lesbian, bisexual, or heterosexual. Most places of worship do not welcome or conduct same-sex marriages, despite having the legal opportunity to do so, and that leaves same-sex couples with few choices.

“In Scotland, same-sex marriage legislation also allowed for humanist marriage from the start, yet ten years on, humanist marriages are still not available to gay and lesbian couples in England and Wales. This feels like unfinished business, and there can be no excuse for ten years of delay. I would like to see legal recognition as soon as possible.”

Data from the 2021 Census showed that two-thirds of lesbian, gay, and bisexual people are non-religious. In April 2023, Sandi Toksvig and Stephen Fry led a joint letter from LGBT people and organisations establishing humanist marriages are an LGBTQ+ rights issue, with only few religious groups offering same-sex marriages. Humanist celebrants always offer same-sex marriages – having done so for decades – and the first two same-sex marriages in Scotland were both humanist.

Sunshine and Solidarity: Brighton’s LGBTQ+ community shines at AIDS Memorial clean-up

On a bright and sunny April morning, members of our LGBTQ+ community of Brighton came together to show their support and care for one of the city’s most poignant landmarks – the AIDS Memorial. Volunteers from the local queer scene rolled up their sleeves and donned their marigold gloves to scrub away the winter’s grime, leaving the memorial plinth gleaming in the spring sunshine.

Channelling his inner Kim Woodburn and leading the scrubbing was Billie Lewis from the Ledward Centre, a long-time pillar of Brighton’s LGBTQ support network. Billie was joined by Aggie/Eric from Brighton & Hove City Council’s LGBTQ+ Workers’ Forum and Mrs Overall/Chris Gull of the Brighton Rainbow Fund, working side-by-side with members of the community to restore the memorial to its former glory.

“It’s so important that we keep this space looking its best,” said Billie. “The AIDS Memorial is a sacred place for our community, a reminder of the loved ones we’ve lost and a symbol of our resilience. Caring for it together is a powerful act of solidarity.”

The Ledward Centre provided the necessary organic and animal friendly cleaning supplies, ensuring the volunteers had everything they needed to tackle the stubborn winter mildew. As the plinth was slowly scrubbed clean, a sense of camaraderie and purpose filled the air, with passers-by stopping to offer encouragement and gratitude.

“Seeing everyone come together like this is truly heart-warming,” remarked Sid, a local business owner. “The LGBTQ+ community in Brighton has always been there for each other, and this clean-up is another example of that unbreakable spirit.”

After the final touches were put on the memorial, the volunteers turned their attention to the adjacent Friendship Bench, which stands as a tribute to the late James Ledward, a towering figure in Brighton’s queer activism. They also planted some seeds sourced from the Pavilion Gardens in the bare earth behind the bench to support the garden space. With the whole area gleaming, the community basked in the satisfaction of a job well done, secure in the knowledge that this sacred space would remain a welcoming and uplifting haven for all.

Unveiling Newton’s Bow: A Spectacular Twist in Rainbow Lore

Unveiling Newton’s Bow: A Spectacular Twist in Rainbow Lore

reported by Ffwl Ebrill

In a recent meteorological spectacle that has set the scientific community abuzz, a few lucky photographers caught site of a very rare phenomenon that has long eluded human observation: the enigmatic “Newton’s Bow.” Unlike its traditional counterpart, Newton’s Bow reveals itself with an unexpected twist, displaying a mesmerizing palette of blue, pink, and white hues against the canvas of the sky. But what causes this beguiling spectacle?

Professor Aurora Prism, a leading expert in atmospheric optics at the Institute of Luminous Phenomena, Oxford sheds some light on this captivating occurrence. “Newton’s Bow is a celestial anomaly that occurs under specific atmospheric conditions,” she explains. “It’s essentially a rainbow’s quirky cousin, appearing only when nature decides to play its most whimsical hand.”

Eyewitness accounts from bewildered onlookers further corroborate the rarity of this phenomenon. “I was on my Trawler on the tranquil sea, just out of Brighton Maria, everything was utterly still and the rain had stopped when suddenly, the sky erupted into a burst of colours unlike anything I’ve ever seen,” recounts Captain McEasy. “It was as if the heavens themselves were putting on a show just for us.”

But what precisely triggers this intersectional display of colours? According to Dr. Iris Refraction, a seasoned meteorologist and co-author of a groundbreaking study into rare atmospheric phenomena, the secret lies in the perfect alignment of celestial and meteorological factors. “Newton’s Bow is a confluence of a flat calm sea, a low sun, strato luminous clouds and very fine rain,” she elucidates. “Under these serendipitous circumstances, light undergoes intricate refractions and reflections, bouncing back onto itself, in effect cancelling out certain colours and resulting in the ethereal beauty that we’ve come to associate with this rare phenomenon.”

Rev Snell of the universal Church of Inclusion, an LGBTQ+ church based in Brighton said ‘how wonderful that this was seen across our skies the day after Trans Day of Visibility yesterday, we all know the rainbow is the Goddesses’ promise to us all, a reminder of the Goddesses commitment to the earth and this special rainbow in the colours of the Trans Flag is a blessing to our Trans and nonbinary communities from the highest spiritual place, it says to our TNBI communities ‘you are loved’.

Indeed, historical records indicate that sightings of Newton’s Bow are as elusive as they are breathtaking. The last documented occurrence, coincidentally on the same date -1st April, see the photo’s here – which was captured on film dates to the late 70’s when people danced to ABBA and flares were the height of fashion. Since then, the phenomenon has remained shrouded in mystery, leaving scientists and sky gazers alike yearning for another glimpse of its splendour.

As the scientific community continues to unravel the mysteries of the natural world, and ubiquity of high-quality cameras continue to provide eyewitness evidence discoveries like Newton’s Bow serve as a poignant reminder of the boundless wonders that await us just beyond the horizon. So, the next time you find yourself gazing at the sky on a tranquil afternoon, keep your eyes peeled for that elusive burst of blue, pink, and white—a reminder that even in the realm of science, magic still thrives.

In the words of Sir Isaac Newton himself, “Nature is pleased with simplicity. And nature is no stranger to the occasional touch of TransJoy.”

 

X