menu

A TRIBUTE TO NUREYEV: English National Ballet at the Coliseum: Review

 A Tribute to Rudolf Nureyev at the Coliseum, London

As this is only the second ballet I’ve seen recently (the first being an accidental brush with Carlos Acosta a few years ago) I came at this piece pretty green.

So please don’t expect any great treatise on what was good and what was bad about either the dancing or the music. Instead, I’ll be yattling on about what I liked and what I didn’t, my overall impression, and which dancer had bigger thigh muscles than the other. Oh, and what I learnt about ballet in the interval from the kind and helpful woman who was sitting next to me.

I mean, let’s face it, ballet and opera are difficult to get into. It took me about six operas before I could tell whether one was good or bad. It’s just not a language we’re brought up with unless we have culture vulture parents and even then the tendency is to just ignore the silly buggers until you get older and think ‘maybe they had a point’. But by then it’s too late and you just have to educate yourself – no easy job when both ballet and opera can cost so much.

I chose this English National Ballet performance in particular because it had a theme – Rudolph Nureyev – and I knew a bit about him which was a start. Also, it comprised three acts with very different sorts of ballet, so it would serve as an introduction to all three.

The reason for this programme is that this year marks the 20th anniversary of Nureyev’s death from AIDS. He’d been diagnosed HIV+ eight years before but had by and large ignored it and simply carried on with his life. If he’d lived, Nureyev would have been 75 this year.

Firstly, there was an informative large screen presentation about the genius of the man, with contributions from people who’d danced with him. He had animal magnetism and was one of those blokes who could walk into a room and turn heads, a quality that unfortunately can’t be captured on screen. Everyone fancied him: everyone wanted to be him. He was a ballet god, one who’d escaped from the nasty Commies and who’d made it his mission to galvanize the Western dance world, a mission in which he succeeded and then some.

Petrushka was originally a Ballet Russe piece, choreographed by Fokine and with music by Stravinsky. It tells an old Russian folk tale of a straw puppet which comes to life and develops emotions including love for his fellow puppet, the Ballerina, who unfortunately only has eyes for the Moor puppet. Yes, the old, old story. Overseeing this puppet love triangle is the Master of Ceremonies, a sort of magician figure with a big white beard and tall Russian hat.

This is a ballet that would have been startlingly new to audiences when it premiered in Paris in 1911 with it’s folk themes, madly modernist costumes and stylised movements. Petrushka scrabbles about with his big puppet hands looking to us now like oven mitts, and I found it difficult without the helpful ‘lady sitting next door’ to follow the very simple story. He seemed at one point to launch himself at a wall which just opened up and half swallowed him, with his legs still dangling in the room, and then the lights went down.

Nureyev apparently loved this role, going back to it again and again. Why? Did he like it because it was a fusion of the traditional Slavic and the avant guarde West, a bit like himself? Or did he simply like the challenge of bringing the straw man to life?

In English National Opera’s hands it only sort of came to life. The fairground crowd scenes were a bit static if tremendously colourful, and Reimair’s Petrushka was suitably puppet-like, with the Ballerina he falls for rather lovely and aloof. The ending was rather abrupt, and I was glad others in the audience obviously knew when to clap as I had no bloody clue.

As some of you may know, clapping is a bit of a bugbear of mine. If you don’t know whether now is the right time to clap, then don’t, otherwise you seem like a right arse and you interrupt the flow. Simple rule. Take heed.

The first interval was 25 minutes. Christ! Enough time to have a proper cup of coffee AND a chat to ‘lady in the next seat’ about what we’d just seen.

I explained my predicament, being a newbie to ballet and all. Turned out she knew a thing or two and was happy to share so I got a potted history of the piece and her opinion: “Well, it was competently danced.” There was a ‘but’ hanging in the air. “But, it wasn’t anything special.”

So there, that’s the verdict from ‘lady in the next seat’ who knew an awful lot more than me simply because she’d been to a lot more ballets than me. Also noted was the fact that another Acosta (i.e. not Carlos) had played the Moor. Yonah Acosta is Carlos’s nephew and is the spit of him from a distance.

I actually did read the reviews of this piece in the big gun newspapers, something I usually never, ever do before writing my review, but I was so adrift in a world I knew so little about that I panicked. I even started a ‘proper’ review myself, but felt so bad at making it all up that I binned it and decided that honesty was the best policy.

Reading these reviews was terribly enlightening. It taught me that reviewing dance is very, very difficult and that’s why the reviews are usually very, very short.

Full of coffee and wisdom, I was ready for the next dance, a modern piece called Song of the Wayfarer choreographed by Béjart and with music from Mahler which was sung by baritone Nicholas Lester.

Two men in sky blue and maroon leotards danced, sometimes in unison – the bigger one in maroon mirroring the smaller one in sky blue – sometimes alone. I wasn’t sure what their relationship was. Often it seemed intimate, only for one to pull away from the other. It was beautiful and simple and I was mesmerized. Those thighs! I would say ‘unnatural’ but I’m pretty sure our fleet-footed ancestors would have had thighs like that and it’s us flabby gits who are the unnatural ones.

It’s only once I’d consulted ‘lady in the next seat’ that I found out that sky blue represented the life of an itinerant dancer (the ‘wayfarer’ of the title) and was Nureyev’s role, and maroon was death. Death!? Well, I didn’t see that one coming. Was he struggling from Death’s grip all those times when I thought he was struggling from a snog? How could I have got that one quite so wrong? As to the performances from Francisco Bosch and, again, Fabian Reimair, I have no clue as to whether they were up to par. Seemed good enough to me though, as they drew beautiful lines with their bodies.

Another 25 minute break later and I felt like a coffee pot. Last up was a more classical piece, one that, if you said the word ballet to anyone, they’d have in their mind’s eye.

Raymonda by Marius Petipa was a famous ballet in the Russian repertoire when Nureyev defected and he was so fond of it that he recreated it from memory, tweaking it here and there. It’s a Hungarian confection of grand basilica sets and gorgeous white, cream and gold colour schemes and is the sort of ballet my mum adores. Tutus make an appearance for the first time in this programme, lots of them, and ballet boys in gloriously dashing military costume. It’s all very very gay (in both old and new money).

What bewildered me was the succession of solos. First we had a stage full of ballerinas and ballet-….hang on, what do you call the male of the species? Boys? Doesn’t seen right. Oh, turns out it’s just ballet dancer. I find it very odd that there isn’t a special word for it. Wonder if they have one in Russia….

So, there was a mass ballet turnout. Then they’d all go off stage and one would come on and do a solo. Clap clap. Then another. Clap clap. Then another. Clap clap. This did get a bit samey, but I just let it all wash over me just as the coffee was trying to wash out of me.

As I had to run off to another performance in Islington, I never did hear what ‘lady in the next seat’ made of the last third of the bill. I liked it, but I don’t think I could have stomached a whole one. Too sugary-sweet even for my sweet tooth.

So, the burning question. Would I go back for another ballet? Like a bloody shot I would. Now I have the taste for it I want to learn more, and it seems to me that the only way to do that is to go and see it live, and the Tribute to Nureyev programme is a pretty good place to start.

WHAT: A Tribute to Nureyev from the English National Ballet

WHERE: The Coliseum, St Martin’s Lane, London

WHEN: Until July 27, 7.30pm, Sat mat 2.30pm

TICKETS: £10 – £67

RUNNING TIME: two and a half hours, inc interval

MORE INFO: CLICK HERE:   

WOULD I GO AGAIN: Yes, and I’d dance for a ticket (although who’d want to see that?)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

MY GAY BEST FRIEND: Emporium: Review

My Gay Best Friend

It’s not often that I see a piece of theatre that makes me cry with laughter one minute and then just cry the next, but My Gay Best Friend managed it easily and I walked out of the Emporium with a tear still in my eye.

Racquell and Gavin are best friends. Both work in Boots in Eastbourne, he as a cleaner and she as a shop assistant. They met when he knocked her carefully put together nail varnish display over with a mop, went arse over tit and ended up in A&E “with four stitches and a lifelong scar.”

Now both are sitting in different toilets, chewing over their lives and their friendship, and talking directly to us, the audience.

Racquell is waiting to go on stage to sing for the first time in a very long time, while Gavin is trying to produce a potful of sperm to inseminate the bull dyke next door.

And there they are for most of the evening. Characters sitting in bogs doesn’t seem like a very promising start to an evening’s theatre, but it’s the perfect mirrored environment for them both to spill the beans (and for Gavin to hopefully spill more than that….)

Funny and soulful at the same time is a difficult act to pull off, but writer Nigel Fairs, who plays his own (somewhat autobiographical) creation Gavin, not only gets away with it, but runs with it and scores a touchdown. It works in two ways: as a series of monologues that would stand up on their own, but when they intertwine you get theatrical dynamite and a beautiful portrait of a strained but solid relationship where each person is as needy of the other but for very different reasons.

It’s easy to see that Racquell, played by ex-Doctor Who and Eastenders actress Louise Jameson, has been damaged by something or someone along the way, but when the revelation comes, it’s heart-wrenching. Jameson’s acting is wonderfully arms flailing Northern brash one minute and eye of the storm the next. She fixes the audience with a steely eye, and seems unafraid to talk in her broad Barnsley accent about anything (“Do you remember discovering your clitoris, girls?”), until it touches on things that no one wants to have to hear.

The more solid, stable figure, nicely spoken Gavin, has got one of those faces that make people open up to him which is sometimes a blessing (when meeting Racquell) and sometimes a curse (when in a darkroom in Sitges). But he’s had his problems, not least of which was growing up gay in Burgess Hill and coming out in the 80s when it was “all those dreadful tombstones on the telly.” Now 45, he thinks  that as a gay man he’s become invisible and despairs of ever having a meaningful relationship again.

The success of this production relies on whether we buy into both characters and their complex relationship, and that’s easy to do with writing this intimate, engaging, and spot on. It’s as if the duo are talking to us over a cup of tea and a Nice biscuit at the kitchen table, with their eyes frequently meeting ours as they let us in on their little secrets, foibles, worries, and often their pain.

This small but perfectly formed production is a must-see for any gay men and fag-hags out there. I guarantee you’ll recognise just a little bit of yourself in Gavin and Racquell. Actually, it’s simply a must-see performance for everyone. Power to its elbow as it goes off on its tiny weeny tour, and I really hope My Gay Best Friend gets a lot more exposure over the next few years. It certainly deserves it. I’ll be looking out for the name Nigel Fairs in the future and will jump at the chance of a ticket to anything else he writes, as should you. I’m confident you won’t be disappointed.

WHAT: My Gay Best Friend

 

WHERE: The Emporium, London Road, Brighton

WHEN: You’ve missed it, but it’s in Bath and Barnstaple later in the year if you’re near there

RUNNING TIME: 80 minutes

MORE INFO: CLICK HERE:

WOULD I SEE IT AGAIN: Yes, and I’d take all my mates too

 

 

 

 

 

TROUSER-WEARING CHARACTERS: Emporium, Brighton: Review

Rose CollisLet’s Misbehave plays as we take our seats, setting the scene nicely for the one-woman show to follow.

 “Trouser-wearing characters are born, not made,” exclaims Rose Collis, writer, historian and performer, steering clear of the ‘G’ word. No, her horizons are broader than just queers. Rose is talking about characters who dominate, appear larger than life, stay on in the memory, make an impact – and it just so happens that most of them are LGBT!

With her trusty banjolele, Bud, and dressed to the nines in full dress suit (cummerbund and bow tie included), Rose guides us skillfully through the highlights of the lives of her chosen subjects, squeezing all the best anecdotes in along the way. Interspersing the chat with songs – evergreens and originals – we’re entertained and informed in equal measure.

First up for scrutiny is Nancy Spain, a nice Roedean girl gone to the dark side, who had a nice line in double entendre cookbooks and whose columns in Beaverbrook’s Daily Express were so catty that the paper got sued twice by Evelyn Waugh. She was killed in a plane crash along with her partner on their way to the Grand National, leaving two young orphaned boys.

Then there was Colonel Sir Victor Barker DSO (Dick Shot Off was the quip on many a lip), a military man who began life as Valerie Arkell-Smith until she got fed up with being married to no-good men and decided the life of a retired colonel was much more comfortable.

A name I vaguely remember from my youth, Dougie Bing was so vain that he often quipped; “I never leave the house without looking like Dougie Bing.” 

Strangely, when I got home from the show and turned on Radio 4, what was on the radio but a programme about Bing starring Julian Clary and filmed in Brighton. Spooky!

Dougie was an old reprobate and the most likely of the TWCs (Trouser-Wearing Characters) to call you ‘dear boy’. He had the distinction of being the first female impersonator to have a show on the Beeb, and from the 50s onwards he became the best panto dame in the business. He ended his time in the Denville Hall Home for Retired Actors where he continued to be a big old queer pain in the bum.

Lastly, there’s Coral Browne, another TWC I’m old enough to remember. Coral was a serial wedder, but also had affairs with numerous women. This omnisexual Oz girl turned posh Brit stage star was engaged to Jack Buchanan in the 40s but when he jilted her she ended up marrying his gay understudy.

Rose, in her neat little show, brings these disparate characters to life with gusto and obvious affection. Not blessed with the best of voices, she gives it a good go anyway and her natural enthusiasm carries her through, but she strums Bud like a pro. Cameo appearances from the likes of Vincent Price (married to Browne), Marlene Dietrich (mate of Spain’s), and Noël Coward (mate of everyone’s so it seems!) spice up the stories and make you want to go and look the characters up on the net after the show’s finished, or go and search out Rose’s own book about one of her TWC’s, Nancy Spain.

I came away thinking if only all history teachers could be as enthusiastic as Rose, every pupil would come away with an A*!

WHAT: Trouser-Wearing Characters

WHERE: The Emporium, London Road, Brighton

WHEN: 26 & 27 July, 7.30pm

RUNNING TIME: an hour

MORE INFO: CLICK HERE:

WOULD I GO AGAIN: Yes, to hear about more TWCs!

Rose Collis

COMPETITION: Gotta Sing, Gotta Dance

Gotta Sing Gotta Dance

Eastbourne Theatres this week are celebrating the opening of their summer musical extravaganza, GOTTA SING, GOTTA DANCE, and they have given Gscene a couple of pairs of tickets to give away, so read on, answer the easy question at the end and you could be going to the opening night!

Celebrating the magic of song and dance legends, movie musicals past and present, current West End smash hits and some favourite classics, GOTTA SING, GOTTA DANCE opens in Eastbourne before embarking on a nationwide tour.

The two hour spectacular runs from 1 – 24 August at the Devonshire Park Theatre and includes songs from Les Mis, Hairspray, Singin’ in the Rain, Oliver, Crazy for You, Miss Saigon, Jesus Christ Superstar and more.

Tickets are £14.50 – £20.50

To win the tickets, just tell us who was the male star of the film of Singin’ in the Rain. Easy as that.

Send your answer, name and number to gscenecomps@gmail.com

Closing date is Tuesday July 30 and the prize is a pair of tickets for the opening night of GOTTA SING, GOTTA DANCE on Thursday Aug 1 at 7.45pm (please note that the tickets will have to be picked up from the Box Office on the night).

JOSEPHINE AND I: Bush Theatre: Review

Josephine and IThe fantastically monickered Cush Jumbo is a girl with twin passions. They’re passions she’s had from when she were a nipper, and those passions are Josephine Baker and performing on stage. In Josephine and I she combines them to dazzling effect.

The scene is a 1920’s St Louis nightclub and we’re sitting slap bang in the middle of it, fiddling with the candles on our tables, wondering if the ad hoc chairs below us are going to take our weight, when a girl rushes onto the stage. She’s so sorry she’s late, she says, breathlessly, as she hauls a real dog out of her bag and thrusts him (Henry) into the stage manager’s arms. She was on her way here, she continues, gasping, and got a call from her agent about a call-back for a part in a big American series. She had to take it, she just had to….

And there. We’re hooked. Hooked into ‘I”s word, whoever ‘I’ is. Is she Jumbo herself, or is she a construct, a part Jumbo’s playing? It’s only about half way in that we begin to twig and by then it really doesn’t matter anyway.

Josephine and I

Jumbo, who stars in her own debut play, interweaves Baker’s life story with a first-person narrative of an aspiring young actress, finding links, be they experiences of racism in different eras or how best to juggle career and family.

The ‘I’ in the piece has loved Baker since she was a kid and saw her in Zou Zou, “and she wasn’t the maid. She was the star!” This led to a Tiny Tears doll makeover, and dolls are used throughout Jumbo’s show, whether it’s Tiny Tears Josephine herself responding with nods and shakes of the head to ‘I”s questions, or hidden in the audience to represent the ‘rainbow tribe’ of twelve children that Baker eventually adopted, and gathered up by Jumbo singing as Baker later on in the show.

As ‘I’ grows up, her fascination with Baker extends from collecting memorabilia of her life and career, to wanting a career on stage for herself too. She puts shows on in her family living room and charges her parents entry and a penny for milk and a cream cracker in the interval.

Shuttling back and forth between ‘I’ and Baker, Jumbo excels in quick changes and making the audience believe in a split second that they’ve been taken from one woman’s world to another’s. Along the way we learn much about Baker’s extraordinary life, beginning in a broken home in St Louis, through international stardom as a dancer and film star, through to her triumphant comeback show in 1973 and her death soon after.

Jumbo’s energy and passion is a thing of beauty. One minute she’s Josephine, a 13 year old getting married to get away from a dead end life in St Louis, the next she’s ‘I’ and figuring out how to juggle the need for kids with a seven series US deal that looks like it’s coming her way. Then it’s back to Josephine, famous now and back in the States but still being made to get to her hotel penthouse suite by the back door.

I wish we’d had a little more of Jumbo doing Baker’s early googly-eyed, loose-limbed performances as when she briefly does them, she’s so good you want to see more of what made Baker such a huge star.

But that’s not a quibble: it’s a wanting more. And I left this terrific show wanting more, so much so that I bought the play script (unheard of from this penny-pinching reviewer!)

Cush Jumbo is a star in the making and if you’ve any interest in theatre, in LIFE, go and see this wonderful show.

WHAT: Jospehine and I

WHERE: The Bush Theatre, Uxbridge Road, London

WHEN: Until August 17, various times

TICKETS: £10 & £15

RUNNING TIME: 90 minutes

MORE INFO: CLICK HERE:   

WOULD I SEE IT AGAIN: Yep yep yep

 

 

 

 

 

THE BOAT FACTORY: King’s Head Theatre: Review

THE BOAT FACTORY

The Harland and Wolff shipyard in Belfast will always be best know to those on the outside as the factory that built the Titanic, but Happenstance Theatre Company’s latest piece gives you the skinny from the inside.

Writer Dan Gordon plays Davy Gordon, a worker in the ‘Boat Factory’, perhaps a relative as most of Dan’s family worked in the place at one time or another, and Dan grew up in its shadow. “It just sits there,” says Davy, “wheezing and groaning and smoking. A city within a city.”

The piece is a love letter to this special place he both misses and once feared, when family, friends, acquaintances would hobble home with missing fingers, broken toes, wounds of all kinds (“At the Boat Factory, health and safety was never an issue”).

Mobile-faced Michael Condron plays every other character in the piece (32 in all) from Davy’s gran and grandpa, through to the distinctly odd Clifford who’s refrain –“Do you wanna go fishing for pigeons?” – sounds like an old music hall number, and who’s not allowed matches since he burnt his grannie’s budgie.

Condron finally settles on Wee Geordie Kilpatrick, a man crippled with polio, who has a strange sense of humour and a Moby Dick obsession. He soon becomes Davy’s best friend.

Often laugh out loud funny, the piece showcases both actor’s talents superbly. They don’t miss a beat as they climb all over the scaffolding which makes up the sparse stage, joshing each other and playing practical jokes. The tales told are interesting and engaging although I did begin to look at my watch about an hour in to this 80 minute piece and wonder where we were going.

But we weren’t really going anywhere and it was the journey that was the thing, and a moving and humorous one it was too.

WHAT: The Boat Factory

WHERE: The King’s Head Theatre, Upper Street, Islington

WHEN: Until August 17

TICKETS: £15 – £25

RUNNING TIME: 80 minutes, no interval

FOR MORE INFO:  https://kingsheadtheatre.ticketsolve.com/shows/873490532/events

WOULD I SEE IT AGAIN: No: been there, done that

 

 

 

WAG! THE MUSICAL: Charing Cross Theatre: Review

Wag the Musical

What is it about musicals and not really letting rip? And I mean REALLY letting rip!

First there was The Book of Mormon which everyone thought was going to be the end word in naughtiness and subversion but which turned out to be practically an Osmonds lovefest. And now we have WAG! The Musical, about a group of women who are ‘needlessly famous’ (as the show’s signature tune has it), a topic just perfect to be made into a big ol’ catfight of a show, where jokes could be lobbed high and left to smash on top of the audiences head like fake Faberge eggs stuffed with candyfloss, chewing gum and razor blades.

Instead, we get a show that doesn’t know which side it’s on: the WAG’s or anyone who’s ever looked at a WAG and thought, at the very least, ‘oh dear’. Consequently, it’s just not the bitchy, sharp, nasty, talons-out free-for-all that it could so easily and so gloriously have been. It is, however, a much more enjoyable night out than I expected.

Set in a London department store, the musical follows the lives of Jen (Daisy Wood-Davis) and Sharron (Amy Scott), two ordinary girls trying to rub along and hopefully better themselves. For Jen this means getting her footballer boyfriend Charlie (Gavin Alex) to leave his wife for her: for Sharron it means a break from the abusive Trevor.

Meanwhile, the store is about to launch a big new clothing range that night and preparations continue apace, with camp store manager Mr Frank (a disappointingly under par Tim Flavin) overseeing proceedings.

Lizzie Cundy, real life ex-WAG and a very odd looking woman indeed, arrives as a red carpet reporter and procedes to totter around on heels and, god help us all, sing. Sing!! What bright spark in the production team thought of that little gem? Shoot them right now please.

But footie is a game of two halves so I’m told, and WAG! does pick up in the second, mainly thanks to Alyssa Kyria who plays the comedy character she’d already developed in comedy clubs, the scene-munching Greek goddess, Ariadne. Some of her lines aren’t exactly inspired – “He’s a greasy git, he smells a little bit, but it’s a small price to pay, if he makes ten grand a day” – but as some old Irish guy used to say ‘it’s the way she tells ’em’.

The problem with WAG! is that it’s all over the place, message-wise. Written by three men, it doesn’t know whether its celebrating the footballers’ wives lifestyle or condemning it. Some consistency is needed in a musical that’s as straightforward as this but we don’t even get it from the main characters, Jen and Sharron, who are one minute slagging off WAGs and the next aspiring to be a (not) paid up member of the club.

Wood-Davis and Scott do make Jen and Sharron both likeable and rootable-for and their singing is heartfelt, while there’s a lovely comic turn from Katie Kerr as Blow-Jo (and yes, you’ve guessed the origin right), a ‘multi-coloured trout’ who’s fat, loud, and shops in Primark.

It’s pleasing to see different sized women in what could have been the most skinny latte of shows, and that they’re not mentioning their weight every five minutes, but it’s not so pleasing to see such stereotypical gay characters once again. So fucking gay is Mr Frank that at one point he ends a song (“Don’t Hide Your Quirk” – is being gay a quirk, Mr Frank?) dressed in Rio carnival gear. The other gayer is Monsieur Bobo, the fashion designer behind the launch, another big camp flamboyant dahhhling. But perhaps I’m being harsh. It’s the nature of a musical to use stereotypes and the straight girls and boys don’t get a much better deal.

As the launch nears, the tension steps up a small kerb. Mr Frank’s booking, Scooch, are stuck in traffic. What to do? Step forward mild-mannered janitor Pete (Chris Grierson) who’s been strumming away in the basement and trying to woo Sharron for the first half of the show. His time to shine has come! It’s just a pity that he not only looks like Olly Murs, but sounds and dances like him too. The poor, poor boy.

Musically WAG! doesn’t shine: it glimmers a bit. The numbers are all passable but generic with only a couple of toe-tappers hidden away. The lyrics are cheeky, knowing, but mostly a bit chewed up by the sounds system, while the singing is patchy, with Wood-Davis’ Jen being the stand-out and Cundy being the stand-in-the-path-of-this-lorry-please.

Overall, this is a nice little musical which passes an evening nicely. And that’s the problem: it’s too darned nice. If the writers were to pack it away in a little Louis Vuitton bag and take it on a fortnight’s holiday to Barbados it might come back as a bigger and better beast, this time with large, pointy fuck-off teeth. Then a ticket would definitely be worth fighting for.

WHAT: WAG! The Musical

WHERE: Charing Cross Theatre, The Arches, Villiers Street, London

WHEN: Until 24 August, various times

TICKETS: £27 – £39.50

RUNNING TIME: just over two hours (I think, but don’t quote me – I got lost in it’s spell)

FOR MORE INFO: http://www.charingcrosstheatre.co.uk/

WOULD I SEE IT AGAIN: I’m surprising myself here, but yes!

STARS: Three

 

 

 

 

 

MERRY WIVES OF WINDSOR: Highdown Gardens, Worthing: Review

Rainbow Shakespeare

Shakespeare used a neat trick in The Merry Wives of Windsor: he took a well-loved character from a couple of his history plays, dumped him in more prosperous surroundings and waited to see what would happen. Falstaff (Richard Kettles) getting chucked in the Thames in a laundry basket happened. And lo, British farce was born.

Worthing’s own Rainbow Shakespeare, a company which mixes seasoned professional actors with amateur ones,  have taken on the most rumpy pumpy of the Bard’s offerings this summer and done a sterling job with it, making a lovely outdoors evening’s entertainment for these long, sultry nights.

The plot is a bit silly and not one of Shakespeare’s best, but it does tend to make a change from the Much Ado’s and Dreams that abound in the hot weather, and it has just enough meat on its bones to make it a worthwhile project.

Attempting to woo two women at once – and two women who are friends for that matter – is never a good idea, but old letch Falstaff doesn’t really ‘do’ subtle and considered. He’s a man who leaps in at the deep end and invariably comes out smelling of fish.

Rainbow approach it in the spirit of Python, with Slender (Stuart Mortimer) being played like that soppy prince in the tower in Holy Grail, while Gallic doctor Caius (John Paul Elsmore) has an outrrrrageous French accent that would put the Taunters in the same film to shame. I did half expect him to burst out with “Your mother was a hamster and your father smelt of elderberries” but he restrained himself (but you could see it was a close run thing).

Rainbow Shakespeare

Then there’s Ford (Mark Lascelles), one of the gullible husbands who believes his pretty, witty wife is having it off with portly old Falstaff. He’s daffy enough when himself, in fetching bright green tights and wearing a floppy orange frisbee on his head while channelling a petulant Pam Ayres, but when he dons a comedy moustache and bright ginger wig to try to snare his missus and the old pig in the act, he becomes so happily absurd that you expect him to break into a silly walk any minute (it helps that he has the Cleese physique).

All this, plus a pace that goes at a right old lick, makes this Wives a jaunty, fun experience, with Falstaff himself being played by Kettles in the classic manner; big white beard, enormous belly and blustering, bluff delivery, while Rosalie Nickerson’s Mistress Quickly is very ‘ooooh matron’ and flapping hands.

The final Herne the Hunter scene is played out under an intense blue light and is the only time when the actors leave the stage (I wish they’d left it more in the body of the play as the staging is a touch static). The ‘fairies’ gather round a bush, giggling and tinkling, while the haystack Falstaff is duped once again by Shakespeare’s strong women.

So if you’re after your annual dollop of outdoor Bardery, I heartily recommend Rainbow Shakespeare’s lively take on the the Merry Wives. And, unlike a lot of outdoor performances, they don’t mind you taking a chair, so there’s none of this sitting on the floor nonsense which is murder for old bones. Comfort and comedy: now there’s an irresistible combination!

WHAT: The Merry Wives of Windsor

WHERE: Highdown Gardens, Worthing (follow the Littlehampton Road until you see the brown sign)

WHEN: Until July 28 at 7.30pm. Sat & Sun matinees at 2.30pm

TICKETS: £16 (half price for kids)

MORE INFO: http://www.worthingtheatres.co.uk/events-by-date/july/name,110636,en.asp

RUNNING TIME: About two hours

WOULD I SEE IT AGAIN: Yes, preferably in a huge thunderstorm for contrast!

 

 

 

 

MACBETH: The Globe: Review

I’ve always been obsessed with the porter in Macbeth. What an oddity he is, stumbling, exploding, ambling, running at full pelt onto the stage – depending on which production you’re seeing – and rambling on about equivocators and the primrose way. He either sets the tone of a production like no other character can, or just sticks out like a sore thumb, as if dumped in the middle of something he has very little to do with.

Macbeth

In actress Eve Best’s directorial debut, the porter is played by veteran drag artiste Bette Bourne who, I’m afraid, falls in the latter camp and has nothing much to do with the rest of the production. That said, Bourne is the most interesting thing in it, made up like a clown complete with red nose, startled eyebrows, and pancake-white make-up, stumbling around drunk but trying hard to retain his poise.

Otherwise, this Jacobean-costumed Macbeth is rather a middling affair, neither great nor gawd blimey bad, which means a pleasant time is to be had at the Globe rather than a startlingly interesting one.

I went to a matinee performance on a sweltering day when half of the groundlings were school kids out on their end of year jolly (or their teacher’s idea of a jolly) so what with their constant cracking of water bottles, the helicopters overhead, and the odd suicidal pigeon, it made for a lively atmosphere.

Joseph Millson makes a beefcake Macbeth, all trimmed black beard and shiny white teeth, but although his delivery’s perfect, he lacks passion until the “tomorrow and tomorrow and tomorrow” speech when suddenly depth appears only to be quickly swallowed up again by frantic action.

Best directs the Scottish play ably and straightforwardly with the only surprise being the humour she brings out in the piece. When Banquo’s ghost (Billy Boyd) marches towards Macbeth along a trestle table, you expect him to put his arms out in front of him and to start doing zombie moans whilst Scooby Doo pops his head up from under the table. The school kids in the audience certainly loved that bit, and every other tension-breaking moment, but after a while the humour was a bit much to take in such a dark play.

Macbeth

Samantha Spiro is a diminutive ball of fury as Lady Macbeth, an out of character part for this actor who’s most usually seen in lighter roles. Her ‘out damned spot’ sleepwalking moment is quietly unnerving. A rasping gasp at every intake of Spiro’s breath is quite disconcerting and I sat there wondering if she smoked heavily or had a wasting lung disease. Spiro and Millson only ever seem to quite gel as a couple when he has his hands round her throat (never a good sign in a marriage).

The set is sparse – the ramparts of a castle in brown and off-white – and the costumes all dun-coloured which adds to the sense of ordinariness that pervades this production, although Olly Fox’s music is rather lively. Pepping things up no end with a rousing pipe and drum accompaniment to the cast’s opening jig (don’t worry: the traditional closing one is there too), the authentic sounding music drives the action forward.

In the end though, I just didn’t believe in Macbeth’s inner life enough and if that fails to grasp the entrails, then the production is really just going through the (albeit very interesting) motions. It is, in a way, the perfect ‘in’ to Shakespeare for kids as there’s an admirably clear line through the play, the dialogue is spoken clearly, the actions match the words, and the humour will keep their interest. Mine just waned.

WHAT: Macbeth

WHERE: The Globe, Bankside, London

WHEN: Various times until October 13

TICKETS: £5 – £39

FOR MORE INFO: CLICK HERE:

RUNNING TIME: two and a half hours

WOULD I SEE IT AGAIN: Yes, but only because it’s the Globe

SOME LIKE IT HOTTER: Connaught Theatre, Worthing: Review

Some Like It Hot

I think some of the grey heads in the Connaught audience were being scratched at the start of Some Like it Hotter when a bewildered man in an anorak clutching a woman’s make-up box wandered onto the stage with Jack Lemmon and Tony Curtis. Had he just made a wrong turn on the way to the loos?

But no, this was Red Hot Charlie (Patrick Bridgman) and he, like us, was entering the Some Like it Hotter Memorial Experience.“Sorry pal, you’ve kicked the bucket,” cackled Jack Lemmon happily, and off we went.

Turns out that when you cark it, you go to a place between life and wherever you’re destined to end up. This is commonly known as purgatory, but not in this play. Here it’s a party: you get to experience once again the time of your life when you were at your happiest and for Charlie it was watching Some Like it Hot when he was 10 and sitting on the sofa next to dear old mum.

So here he is, in a Chicago speakeasy in 1929 and a shoot-out is about to kick off.

At first, the set up of this gentle comedy musical written by Richard Hurford can appear a little confusing. Does Charlie meet Lemmon, Curtis and Monroe or Jerry, Joe and Sugar or Daphne, Josephine and Sugar? But when you grasp that it’s the Hollywood actors themselves who are stuck in this stairwell to heaven, having to play their most famous creations until, well, they don’t know when, it becomes a little clearer.

And when Charlie first sets eyes upon Marilyn you know that a love story of sorts is going to be involved: one, in fact, that turns out to be rather sweet and poignant and not at all what you’d expect. And boy does Sarah Applewood look like Marilyn.

Some Like It Hot

Set in a crumbling theatre with a broken-down stage, not-so-grand piano, and a sparkling mirror ball, Charlie relives his film fantasy scene by famous scene, while the banter is about life, death, love, fame and his mum. Along the way we get some cracking 1920’s tunes – Sweet Georgia Brown, Yes Sir, That’s My Baby – with the whole cast of six (the main actors plus two on stage stagehands) swinging along on various instruments. The voices are not so hot – more like tepid – but adequate to carry off the task at hand and arthritic toes were tapping and old bodies swaying.

Sometimes Some Like it Hotter moves a little slowly, but it’s never less than charming as Monroe keeps in character for every minute of the 2 hours running time. I was watching her closely from the front row (as you do) and her face never once dropped out of Monroe-mode, not once, and it’s a very difficult mode to keep up, with the face being mobile at all times. No wonder Charlie loved watching her all those years ago. Ah, but there’s that twist again. They have a secret. “Me and Charlie go way back,” breathes Marilyn again and again. But in what way, we wonder.

Daniel Lloyd as Lemmon has that larger than life sense of fun although he doesn’t resemble him at all. He’s got that Daphne chuckle down to a tee though. Paul Matania’s Curtis is more of a look-a-like (although he looks far more like Daniel Radcliffe if anyone ever thought to make him into a stick of rock) and sound-a-like. The Radcliffe look is more pronounced when he appears in the natty naval look as Junior, the Cary Grant of the Riviera.

As laydees, the pair excel, with Matania playing Jerry playing Daphne looking like he/she’s just stepped out of an Aubrey Beardsley drawing, whereas Lloyd as Joe as as Josephine just looks like Terry Scott in a dress. Charlie soon joins them (“I want to catch the train to Florida and dress up in women’s clothes”) in a tasseled flapper dress that barely covers his arse and which made the audience reach for their sunglasses at the sight of his lilywhite legs. He’s having the best fun this side of the doors to heaven.

Apart from versions of the film’s famous scenes, nothing much happens but chat and songs, but the characters come across poignantly and you wish them the ‘happy endings’ they so ardently desire. There’s some very silly humour – apparently Daphne was 25 before she even heard the word ‘pelvis’ and even then she thought it was a wild animal – and a nice bit of irony when they make a long legal speech about how the play has nothing at all to do with the film of the same name.

The twist in the plot isn’t exactly a shocker, but it’s satisfying enough, and fear not: we do, of course, get the funniest last line in film history, plus a couple of songs as encores for good measure.

The night before I went to see Some Like It Hotter, I’d been to the press night of Dirty Dancing in the West End. Guess which one I liked more. Yes, sometimes those little old plays in those little old local theatres that no one but oldies think of going to, have more heart and soul than half a dozen West End shows put together.

WHAT: Some Like It Hotter

WHERE: Connaught Theatre, Worthing

WHEN: Tough luck, you’ve missed it unless it comes round on tour again

WOULD I SEE IT AGAIN: Yes, only I wouldn’t take my mother who’d never seen the film and was a little more bewildered than she usually is

 

X